The phrase "assessment identified" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where a specific assessment or evaluation has been recognized or noted.
Example: "The assessment identified several key areas for improvement in the project."
Alternatives: "evaluation noted" or "review highlighted".
An ECB stress test known as a "comprehensive assessment" identified a capital shortfall of €4.4bn under a best-case scenario and €14.4bn in a worst-case situation.
Our initial assessment identified up to £2.32m that could be saved from GP local enhanced services contracts without impacting on patient quality or outcomes to be achieved over a period of two years.
Similarity assessment identified only ten partly comparable benchmark experiments that can be utilized in the field of GFR development.
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale assessment identified two patients with suicidal behavior and one with suicidal ideation in the add-on lithium group.
To this effect, the educational and training reforms have to be based on the market needs assessment identified by appropriate market research.
In addition, the quality index assessment identified only 5/20 studies being a high level and low risk of bias, and therefore, future studies should attempt to conduct more stringent research in this area.
Radiographic assessment identified an open-book type pelvic fracture, with apparent fluid collection, which was not evident during the initial ultrasound examination due to the poor imaging quality caused by the subcutaneous emphysema.
The VISA assessment identified 17 additional individuals (9 males) with lifetime history of self-injury; of the total 103 identified through any means, then, 16.5% were newly identified by the VISA.
This polyfunctional assessment identified unexpected phenotypes, including cells producing both type 1 and type 2 cytokines, and highlighted interferon γneg (IFNγneg) antigen-reactive populations overlooked in our previous studies.
The QUOROM guidelines and the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group Guidelines for Systematic Reviews were followed throughout: methodological assessment identified RCTs of 'high' or 'medium' methodological quality, based on their inclusion of at least 50% of the specified internal validity criteria.
Obstetricians' partographic assessment identified "likely brachial plexus injury" in 13 of 54 cases (24%) and 16 of 108 control subjects (15%), and in only 3 cases (6%) did the assessors concur (positive predictive value, 7%-17%; negative predictive value, 5%-12%; sensitivity, 24%-50%; specificity, 66%-68%).
