The phrase "assessment frequency" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing how often assessments or evaluations are conducted in a particular context, such as education or performance reviews.
Example: "The assessment frequency for this course is set to every two weeks to ensure students are keeping up with the material."
Alternatives: "evaluation interval" or "testing frequency".
Current field-based assessment methodology provides the needed information, but is costly, and therefore assessment frequency is low.
The negative confounding effect of assessment frequency suggests that high frequencies of assessment, as it presumably applies to both math and science subjects, contribute positively to math-science coherence.
Items that surveyed program organization included: date of commencement, setting of recruitment and assessment, frequency and duration of each assessment session, and referral sources.
This suggests that the results of the primary analysis are relatively resistant to any ascertainment bias conferred by the minor imbalances in 24-month EDSS assessment frequency and time between assessments.
A balance must be found between assessment frequency, SDI results and other clinical and sociodemographic considerations to keep patient and staff burden to a minimum without losing sensitivity of identifying patients who are struggling.
In each group, patients with a pre-treatment defective hygiene seem to present more complications than the others (data not shown) but no significant differences between the two groups were found regarding general buccodental status assessment, frequency of tooth brushing, incidence of cavities.
Overall levels of interobserver agreement for baseline rate, tracing quality assessment, frequencies of accelerations and decelerations, and alerts ranged from 45% to 99% and were highest for baseline rate and signal loss and lowest for acceleration and deceleration counts.
This may partly explain the variation in assessment frequencies, which are discussed below in more detail.
In the present study, we performed a literature search using PubMed in aims of comparing QOL assessment frequencies between international and Japanese RCT reports.
Self-assessment frequency varied by intervention occurring weekly (74, 76, 83), monthly (76), quarterly (82, 84), or at the provider's discretion (82).
For assessment of frequency tuning, the response area was defined as the frequency range that elicited more than 50% of the maximum response.
