The phrase "assessment especially when" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to introduce a specific context or condition under which an assessment is particularly relevant or important.
Example: "The results of the assessment are crucial, especially when determining the effectiveness of the new program."
Alternatives: "evaluation particularly when" or "review notably when".
Satellite data are extremely useful for disaster assessment especially when before and after imagery is available for change detection [131].
Patient satisfaction surveys (though relevant) have a limitation of potential biased assessment especially when interviews are conducted in health facility premises [10 13].
In the context of security work, this chapter provides an understanding of 10 searches that work fairly well during a security assessment, especially when combined with the site operator, which secures the first position in the search list.
Epidemiological documentation of endocrine disruption is complicated by imprecise exposure assessment, especially when exposures are mixed.
Differences in metabolic patterns among phthalates are important both toxicologically and in exposure assessment, especially when comparing relative exposures to different phthalates because the complex metabolism of high-molecular-weight phthalates leads to additional metabolic products (e.g., oxidative metabolites).
Other data that should be factored into the assessment, especially when the human population being studied contains fetuses and children, are the timing of the exposure (or when the exposure took place) during those critical susceptible periods of development.
PD is a concern in educational assessments, especially when groups of students are to be compared on the proficiency variable because item responses gathered in the groups could be differently affected by PD.
> For the students, coaching was mainly associated with being observed during assessments, especially when presenting a patient history.
This information might help to corroborate diagnostic assessments, especially when masses with small diameters are found incidentally.
The unbalanced 5-category scale might therefore provoke higher causality assessment responses, which may lead to skewed assessments, especially when used by non-experts.
Although subjectivity does not necessarily imply unreliability (Van der Vleuten et al. 1991; Swanson et al. 1995), it is nevertheless of critical importance to reduce the risk of arbitrary judgment, especially when assessment relies on single judgments by single assessors.
