Sentence examples for assessment differed in from inspiring English sources

Outcome assessment differed in how adherence was measured including, for example, pharmacy refill and self-report of the number of missed doses.

Earlier studies on in-training assessment differed in the optimal number of assessments needed for a sound judgement of clinical performance (Alves de Lima et al. 2007; Norcini and Burch 2007; Wilkinson et al. 2008).

Although our results may seem inconsistent with those of risk assessment, biomonitoring and risk assessment differ in their focus.

That is, differences in item p-values may not be valid indicators of DIF if the samples completing each mode of assessment differ in mean level on the measure.

Results provide converging evidence that: (a) the spelling assessments differed in the cognitive load placed on test-takers; (b) performance decreased with increasing cognitive load of the assessment; and (c) brain regions associated with working memory were more highly activated during performance of assessments that were higher in cognitive load.

The third study [ 3], although scoring well on both quality assessments, differed in other ways from the other studies.

The assessments differ in techniques for data collection, such as remote sensing (Eckert et al. 2011), mapping (Boruff et al. 2005; Collins et al. 2009), available socioeconomic data as input for multivariate statistics (Cutter et al. 2000, 2003), focus groups (Brooks et al. 2005) or content analysis (Turner et al. 2003).

While all the physicians questioned were interested in the subject, the relationship with the patient and the expectations with regard to such assessment differed according to predefined categories, in particular mode of practice and age.

The subgroup of participants in the behavioural assessment differed from all patients who attended the participating clinics during the study period (and whose records were reviewed) as they were significantly less likely to be male (65.4% vs 69.7%); aged 25 years or older (62.5% vs 68.9%); white non-Hispanic (36.8% vs 45.9%) and reside in San Francisco (35.2% vs 51.0%).

The two assessment methods differed in 26 % of the consultations.

Assessments differed drastically in format, question-type, length, and provision and this heterogeneity among assessments hinders direct comparison.