Consequently, the accuracy of both imaging techniques for tumor size assessment differed significantly.
However, their assessments differ significantly because each group associates these feelings with different aspects.
Proportions of patients classified as over-paralyzed, well-paralyzed, and under-paralyzed based on TOF measurements and clinical assessments differed significantly (p < 0.0001).
Engelbrecht and Harding (2004) found that, in the domain of summative assessment, online assessment does not differ significantly from that of paper-based assessment.
Another factor that could reduce head circumference is day of assessment, because initial assessment may be affected by edema or hematoma after birth, though day of assessment did not differ significantly by self-reported maternal smoking during pregnancy.
This, however, did not translate directly into Levine functional and symptom scores which, at each assessment, did not differ significantly between the two methods.
Participants of this assessment did not differ significantly from the non-participants in terms of the major variables studied at 15 months, except for parental ego-resiliency, with primary caregivers who did not participate showing lower levels of ego-resiliency than those who did participate (t = 2.08, p < .05).05
Similarly, mean safety compliance scores at the 12-month postintervention assessment period did not differ significantly among the intervention and control workgroups controlling for baseline safety compliance scores and age (B = −0.02, p =.83, Δ R =.001).
In contrast, mean SF-12 physical health composite scores at the 12-month postintervention assessment period did not differ significantly among the intervention and control workgroups controlling for baseline SF-12 scores, age, and use of blood pressure medication (B = −0.32, p =.69, Δ R <.001).
During subsequent assessments, groups did not differ significantly for any of the 7 preselected scales analyzed.
