The phrase "assessment design was" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the characteristics or elements of an assessment design in a past context.
Example: "The assessment design was effective in measuring student learning outcomes."
Alternatives: "evaluation framework was" or "assessment structure was".
A prospective repeated-measures observed structured clinical examination (OSCE) assessment design was used to score participants in their competence to assess and manage a scenario based 'emergency patient' at baseline, immediately post-course, and 8 weeks after the delivery of the teaching course.
An Ecological Momentary Assessment design was employed with young women (n = 126; Mage = 21.26; SD = 2.76) who responded to surveys 3 times daily every other day for 1 week.
The emphasis in this assessment design was on obtaining a more accurate picture of student's problem-solving performance which challenged us to raise our expectations about student success from improved standardized test score data to an approach that focused on the way students think about mathematical tasks.
The initial quantitative assessment design was applied to six cities chosen from regions of South-East China – Guangzhou, Foshan, Shenzhen, Fuzhou, Xiamen and Hangzhou.
N.P.L.: developed needs assessment design, was responsible for implementation of the needs assessment, contributed to analyses, contributed to drafting and revising of manuscript.
Assessment design was robust: videos were stratified by clinical severity, allowing for greater variability in the mid-range of severity unknown to investigators, then randomly assigned with a random order for scoring descriptors.
Implications of this for academic literacy instruction and assessment design are presented.
The general framework of evidence-centered assessment design is used to describe PSLEs in terms of assessment concepts, and to identify similarities between the process of assessment design and of PSLE design.
Support for nontraditional students, team-based quality control, and assessment design are critical.
Study population selection and exposure assessment design are linked.
So a programmatic approach to assessment design is advocated (Lew et al. 2002; Schuwirth et al. 2002; Van der Vleuten and Schuwirth 2005).
