The phrase "assessment data points" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to evaluating or measuring performance, progress, or outcomes, particularly in educational or analytical settings.
Example: "The teacher analyzed the assessment data points to determine the students' understanding of the material."
Alternatives: "evaluation metrics" or "measurement indicators".
This identification often needs to happen across multiple assessment data points and should be considered in comparison to the class's progress as a whole.
Can information from individual assessment data points be aggregated meaningfully?
The evaluation data provided no conclusive answer to the question if formative and summative functions of assessment can be combined in multiple assessment data points.
Presurgical disease progression rates for the various functional outcome measures were first calculated using linear regression analyses for subjects with multiple available presurgical outcome assessment data points.
These slopes were utilized to determine whether postsurgical assessment data points at 6, 9, 12, and 15 months were improved relative to predicted points extrapolated from the presurgical progression rates.
Investigations include presentation of the individual data analyses and fatigue strength assessment of all the data points by the effective notch stress approach with the reference radius rref = 1.00 mm.
While formative assessment implies assessment for learning, students perceived individual data points as primarily summative, i.e. as assessment of learning.
Assessment of model fit was based on comparison of residual deviance to the number of unconstrained data points and assessment of the deviance information criterion.
We defined the presence of disease from health assessment data by standard cut-off points (see web extra for details of measures and cut-off points used).
The Grubbs' test was applied to each of the samples as an objective assessment as to whether these data points should be classified as outliers or stragglers according to ISO guidlines.
Time was defined as the exact number of months between the start of ChEI treatment and each assessment, which indicated that all data points were used at the actual time intervals.
