Psychological assessment consisted of computerized word sorting task (used to assess implicit associations) and a paper-and-pencil questionnaire seeking information on explicit doping attitude, and basic demographic information (gender, age, ethnicity, sport, level of competition, nationality).
The technology-based assessment consisted of a 45-min online speed test.
This assessment consisted of 8 aroma descriptors (toasted, muttony, medicinal, fatty, milky, earthy, sour and waxy).
The reading assessment consisted of 28 items, and the mathematics assessment consisted of 48 items, representing approximately 60 minutes of testing time for reading and 120 minutes for mathematics.
The assessment consisted of interview, inspection of premises, document examination and assessment of training and maintenance standards.
The steps in the assessment consisted of a baseline assessment of past and current situation, and an identification of sustainability objectives.
Each assessment consisted of six questions; each question was graded according to a seven-point Likert scale (one nonuseful/unusable, seven very useful/easy to use).
The assessment consisted of procedural knowledge items because they were similar to the types of mental computation skills required of the students during the intervention.
The extraoral assessment consisted of evaluation of each patient's profile in which the presence of soft tissue maxillary and/or mandibular hypoplasia/retrognathia was observed.
Dietary assessment consisted of a 24-hour dietary recall interview and questions on supplement use, food security, food-program participation, and other behaviors.
Outcome assessment consisted of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical evaluation after 5 and 24 h, and histology (perfusion fixation after 24 h).
