The phrase "assessment adjusted for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing evaluations or measurements that have been modified to account for specific factors or variables.
Example: "The final grade was based on an assessment adjusted for individual learning styles."
Alternatives: "evaluation modified for" or "assessment modified for".
Table 3 shows the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for failure in the clinical skills assessment, adjusted for sex, age, and score on the applied knowledge test.
Mammographic density was measured at entry as a percentage visual assessment, adjusted for age and body mass index.
We used a generalised linear model to compare questionnaire item scores by teaching method at each assessment adjusted for the baseline score in the first half of the trial and for the first assessment score in the second half of the trial, from which we report mean differences in the change in score with 95% confidence intervals.
We estimated the α paths using linear regression models on theoretical constructs at the immediate post-intervention assessment, adjusting for baseline of the theoretical construct and consistent condom use.
Our study tends to confirm the association between air pollutants and gestational age corrected birth weight using personal exposure assessment, adjusting for many potential confounders not always considered in previous studies, and focusing on a marker of air pollution specific of traffic and combustion sources.
The HIV/STI risk-reduction and health-promotion interventions did not differ significantly on consistent condom use averaged over the 6- and 12-month follow-up assessments, adjusting for baseline consistent condom use.> -wrap-foot>> -wrap-foot> MSM men who have sex with men The intervention effect is averaged over the 6-month and 12-month post-intervention assessments.
Group comparisons on post-intervention written and OSCE (clinical) assessment scores adjusted for baseline written assessment scores were made using two-way analysis of covariance.
Similar quality indicators relating to CVD risk assessment have recently been introduced [ 29], in that RA patients aged between 30 85 will be expected to have had an annual CVD risk assessment, using a CVD risk assessment tool adjusted for RA.
This was not necessary for the MRC assessment covariates adjusted for, as they had less than 2% missing data.
We used linear regression models to examine associations of exposures with cognitive assessment scores, adjusted for potential confounders.
