Our performance analysis aims at assessing which of the two channels is the more favourable for target detection.
Little work has been done on assessing which of the attributes of the nodes has greater impact on the overall dynamics of the network.
To assess which of these technologies to adopt is a challenge, since hardly any methods to evaluate the sustainability benefits exist.
At the age of 16, every resident takes a test to assess which of these four character traits they hold most prominent, and then they are given a choice of which faction to join.
Through proteome and transcriptome data [12] [14] we assessed which of these molecules are expressed in the Pf parasite erythrocytic stage.
By looking at the set of bootstrap modular descriptions, we can assess which of these assignments are strongly supported by the data, and which node assignments are less certain.
To quantify change in large networks, we must first identify the important structures, then assess which of these structures are statistically significant, and finally capture how these structures change.
Our approach was therefore to assess which of these variables were most closely correlated with observed mortality patterns, rather than to attempt to generate hypotheses, in order to determine which were most important within our data.
In order to elucidate the contribution of the different feedback pathways, we evaluated topologies that contained only two of the three pathways, JNK+IKK, ERK+JNK, and ERK+IKK, in addition to the original topology containing all the ERK, JNK, and IKK feedbacks (Figure 5A D) to better assess which of these kinases plays a role, and hence is non-redundant in our cell system.
