Sentence examples for assessing the papers from inspiring English sources

Assessing the papers in this way enabled an important cross-referencing of the extent to which the evidence they hold was potentially valid.

Two teams of two reviewers each (SCF and NB, AMH and MC) assessed the papers for eligibility and extracted data independently.

At least two independent reviewers will assess the papers for inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Two investigators (A.M. and A.A.C) independently assessed the papers generated for relevancy.

Two reviewers (a hepatologist and a hepatologist-statistician) independently assessed the papers with predetermined STARD criteria.

61 The researcher and supporting reviewer (JB and DM, see acknowledgements) assessed the papers until these themes emerged as the most commonly occurring premises.

We will assess the papers for applicability and bias using the QUADAS-2 tool 11 as well as study size and declarations of competing interests.

The reviewers typically assess the paper based on what is presented — they do not see all the data — but they often can tell when researchers are overstating their drug discoveries.

Articles selected for peer-review are sent to two anonymous external referees, who assess the paper's novelty, importance, and validity.

If this does not resolve the discrepancy, a third reviewer will assess the paper and act as an adjudicator.

Full Paper Assessment Phase: Two reviewers (MA/TQ) assessed the full papers for relevance (as before).