The phrase "assessing the interval of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are evaluating or analyzing a specific range or period of time, measurement, or data set.
Example: "The researchers are assessing the interval of time between the two events to determine any significant correlations."
Alternatives: "evaluating the range of" or "analyzing the period of".
Spiske et al. (2013) emphasized the significance of the preservation potential in assessing the intervals and frequencies of tsunamis, because tsunami deposits are not necessarily preserved in whole inundated areas.
Objectives: To assess the interval change of the minimal joint space width (MJS) in radiographs of the tibiofemoral (TF) joint and of the patellofemoral (PF) joint with a 2-year follow-up in middle-aged people with longstanding knee pain with or without radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) and to study the precision of the MJS measurements.
A crude Monte Carlo simulation for assessing the corresponding interval of the failure probability requires the solution of a double optimization problem for each probability level of the limit state function.
To assess the optimal interval of preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) administration in diabetic subjects undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for severe manifestations of active proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).
BCG and rBCG were grown in MB7H9 broth supplemented with 1× ADC and 0.2% Tween 80. Growth was assessed at the intervals of 24 hr for 19 days by measuring the absorbance of the culture spectro-photometrically at a wavelength of 600 nm (A600 nm).
Even though in most of the invasive studies mentioned above the optimal AV delay tended to be between 100 and 120 ms shorter than the intrinsic AV interval, assessing the pure effect of shortening AV delay during biventricular/LV pacing is difficult.
[ 11- 14] The aim of this paper is to contrast the frequentist approach (p-values, confidence intervals) with a Bayesian approach (credible intervals) for assessing the role of chance in cluster investigations (i.e., whether the cluster represents a statistical excess).
Experiments assessing the effects of the postmortem intervals on brains using mice or rats support these observations [ 38].
All follow-up examinations were grouped on the basis of annual intervals for assessing the course of prevalences of undesired outcomes and radiographic component loosening.
