Bimonthly surveys assessed the perceived helpfulness of each brochure.
In assessing the mental health literacy of the general Australian community, Reavley et al. [ 29] developed a scale that assessed their beliefs about the helpfulness of a range of treatment options endorsed by health professionals.
The mean rating of helpfulness of the guidelines on a visual analog scale was 50.65, and the factor most associated with assessing the treatment guidelines as reliable was the reliability to the organization that developed the guideline (57.0%).
The HAQ assesses the two factors "perceived helpfulness" and "collaboration or bonding".
Participants were also presented with scales assessing their perceptions about the helpfulness of a range of help-seeking options to help "Z" to deal with this problem (rated as 'very helpful', 'fairly helpful', 'neither helpful nor unhelpful', 'fairly unhelpful', 'very unhelpful', 'don't know').
Automatically assessing review helpfulness.
Mean responses were: 3.1 and 3.0 for 2 items assessing perceived impact on communications, 3.8-4.0 3.8-4.0tems assessing perceived helpforness, 3.0 and 3.10 for 2 items assessing impact on affecting oncologists' communication with patients and assistance with challenging conversations, respectively, and 3.6 for whether usitemshe CD-ROM wassessingtheir time.
A questionnaire was administered among 4671 undergraduates to examine their depression literacy relating to problem-recognition, measured using a vignette of a depressed undergraduate, and their treatment beliefs measured by assessing their perceptions about the helpfulness of various options of help for the presented problem.
The items assessed the media components, counselor concern, encouragement in going to the dentist, helpfulness in going to the dentist, ease of talking, and trust.
In order to assess the extent to which participants exhibit meliorist attitudes, the Measure of Understanding, Support, and Helpfulness (MUSH) scale was created for the study.
