Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The QUOROM statement was chosen for assessing reporting quality.
Similar(59)
To assess reporting quality of studies using routinely collected health data (RCD) to inform the REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected health Data RECORDD) guideline development.
Additionally, the fulfilment of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Items [ 17] was used to assess reporting quality.
Most instruments assess reporting quality and internal and external validity simultaneously although consequences of poor reporting, risk of bias and generalizability of the results are very different.
Relevant information concerned randomization, blinding, and withdrawal and dropouts was collected to assess reporting quality using a commonly used 5-point scoring system [ 36].
The checklists and scales currently used for assessing study validity of animal studies [ 10- 14] vary greatly, are sometimes designed for a specific field (i.e., toxicology) and often assess reporting quality and internal and external validity simultaneously.
To assess report quality, the included meta-analyses were assessed using the component and overall scores from the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire (OQAQ).
To test our hypotheses, we reviewed popular reporting of effects of smoking cessation therapy in ADM populations and relied on the Oxman et al 14 instrument to assess report quality.
We assessed participation reporting quality, calculated percentages of participation achieved, and measured the influence of study design and participant characteristics.
We assessed the reporting quality of randomized and nonrandomized, controlled trials presented in abstract form at the European Association of Urology annual meeting in a 10-year period and determined the impact on subsequent publication.
The authors conducted a study to assess the reporting quality of randomized controlled trial (RCT) abstracts published in leading general dental journals, investigate any improvement after the release of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) for Abstracts guidelines, and identify factors associated with better reporting quality.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com