The phrase "assessing liability" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to legal, financial, or risk management discussions where the responsibility or obligation of a party is being evaluated.
Example: "The company is currently assessing liability for the damages caused during the incident."
Alternatives: "evaluating responsibility" or "determining accountability".
We asked these judges to rule on this motion before assessing liability.
The airlines and the T.S.A. have not yet been able to agree on a formula for assessing liability for claims, since checked bags pass through the hands of employees from both.
These documents, it is said, will reveal the strength or weakness of the Board's case against the contractors and the facts or assumptions on which the Board relies in assessing liability.
Although the Court of Appeal did not specifically refer to the six factors Locklin identified for use in assessing liability, factors which we hold courts should apply uniformly in all flood control cases, we nonetheless conclude the trial court adequately assessed the reasonableness of District's flood control measures by using a comparable test.
Issues such as assessing liability in the results of accidents involving AGV need to be discussed.
It's a fascinating read, touching a lot of key points, from the creation a European Agency for robotics and artificial intelligence to a method for regulating and assessing liability in case a robot causes any damage.
By the time a court can assess liability, firms, products, and the marketplace are likely to have changed dramatically.
Because we find the Board lacked authority to assess liability using this standard, we reverse and remand.
The investor who gets paid to "buy" the shares is gambling that ultimately, the assessed liability will be less than what was paid for them.
The court wrote, "By the time a court can assess liability, firms, products and the marketplace are likely to have changed dramatically.
But medical experts outside the federal government asked to review the proposal expressed concern that guidelines could be seen as an attempt to assess liability for diseases linked to the dust rather than an effort to find answers that could lead to improved diagnosis and treatment.
