Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
assessing changes from pre to post intervention
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "assessing changes from pre to post intervention" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to research, evaluations, or studies where you are measuring the effects of an intervention over time. Example: "The study focused on assessing changes from pre to post intervention to determine the effectiveness of the new teaching method."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
The control hospital results were adjusted to ensure there is no change from pre to post intervention.
Science
This is particularly relevant to educational interventions because educational outcomes are often measured pre and post intervention and investigators are tempted to conduct single arm trial and simply measure change of the score from pre to post intervention.
Science
As a secondary aim, we examined the impact of self-reported change in physical activity on change in CRP from pre to post intervention.
Science
The within-subject changes in questionnaire scores from pre to post intervention were analyzed using dependent t-tests.
First, the primary statistic we used to interpret the effectiveness of the intervention was the difference between the 2 study groups in change of the score from pre to post intervention while the authors of the original studies used the change of the score from pre to post in the intervention group.
Science
Absolute diff = difference between groups in change in proportions pre to post intervention.
Science
The change from pre to post-intervention score was measured using a validated questionnaire assessing knowledge (primary outcome) and attitudes (secondary outcome).
Science
The regular meditator group started off with a higher plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, and this ratio did not change from pre- to post-intervention.
Science & Research
Statistical analysis was carried out to assess the degree of refractive change from pre to post vitrectomy, and to determine any correlation of refractive change observed and a variety of pre, intra and post operative factors.
Science
To reduce data, we calculated mean change scores from pre-to post-intervention for ratings of liking and attractiveness (separately) for each category of food images.
Science
Post-hoc tests indicated no change from pre to post in the control group (M = .08 at both time points), while significantly more subjects mentioned this category following the intervention (M pre = .05 to M follow-up = .10, p < .001).001
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When reporting the results of your assessment, clearly state the specific metrics used to measure change. This adds transparency and allows for easier replication by other researchers.
Common error
Avoid attributing all observed changes solely to the intervention. Always consider and address potential confounding variables that may have influenced the results from pre- to post-intervention.
Source & Trust
74%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "assessing changes from pre to post intervention" functions as a descriptor of a process, typically within research or evaluation contexts. It specifies the action of evaluating differences observed between two time points relative to an intervention.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "assessing changes from pre to post intervention" is grammatically correct and typically used within scientific and research contexts to describe the evaluation of differences before and after an intervention. Despite not having direct examples in Ludwig's database, Ludwig AI confirms its usability in English. While there are no directly observed authoritative sources due to the absence of examples, the generated information positions the phrase as formal and scientific. To provide alternatives, one could consider phrases like "evaluating changes between baseline and follow-up" or "comparing outcomes before and after treatment". Proper usage involves accounting for confounding variables and clearly stating the metrics used for measuring change.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
analyzing differences from pre-intervention to post-intervention
Replaces "assessing changes" with "analyzing differences", which is similar but emphasizes the analytical aspect.
evaluating changes between baseline and follow-up
Focuses on the time points (baseline and follow-up) rather than explicitly mentioning "pre" and "post intervention".
evaluating the pre- to post-intervention shift
Shortens the phrase while maintaining the core meaning, using "shift" to describe the change.
comparing outcomes before and after treatment
Uses "treatment" as a synonym for intervention and focuses on the comparison of outcomes.
examining variations between pre- and post-intervention periods
Uses "examining variations" which is more general than "assessing changes" and focuses on the periods.
measuring pre- and post-intervention outcomes
Focuses on measuring outcomes specifically at the two time points.
measuring the impact of an intervention
More general; it doesn't specifically mention the pre/post comparison but implies it.
quantifying the change resulting from the intervention
Focuses on quantifying the change rather than just assessing it, implying a more numerical approach.
determining the effect of an intervention over time
Emphasizes the time aspect and the effect, but doesn't explicitly mention pre/post.
assessing the intervention's influence on outcomes
Highlights the influence of the intervention, with the before and after implied in the assessment.
FAQs
How can I phrase "assessing changes from pre to post intervention" differently?
You can use alternatives like "evaluating changes between baseline and follow-up", "comparing outcomes before and after treatment", or "analyzing differences from pre-intervention to post-intervention".
What does "pre to post intervention" mean in research?
In research, "pre to post intervention" refers to the period before an intervention is applied and the period after its application. Assessing changes from pre to post intervention helps determine the intervention's effectiveness.
Why is it important to assess changes from pre to post intervention?
Assessing changes from pre to post intervention allows researchers and practitioners to determine whether an intervention has had the intended effect, providing evidence for its efficacy and informing future decisions.
What statistical methods are commonly used when assessing changes from pre to post intervention?
Common statistical methods include paired t-tests, repeated measures ANOVA, and regression analyses, depending on the nature of the data and the research design. These methods help determine if the observed changes are statistically significant.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
74%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested