The phrase "assessed using analyses of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the evaluation or examination of data or subjects through specific analytical methods.
Example: "The results were assessed using analyses of various statistical models to ensure accuracy."
Alternatives: "evaluated through analyses of" or "examined using analyses of".
Between-group differences in brain activation associated with motor response inhibition were assessed using analyses of covariance.
Evaluation of statistical significance for data from RT-PCR, Western blots, cell growth and colony formation was assessed using analyses of variance (ANOVA) and the Fisher protected least significant difference test.
Differences in age and educational levels among the three groups were assessed using Analyses of Variance (ANOVA).
The differences in the distribution of respondents by body-weight status were assessed using analyses of chi-squared tests.
The activity of the destructive process was assessed using analyses of serum and synovial fluid levels of the cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) and the proteolytic enzyme MMP3.
Overall differences in awareness and knowledge scores between the three types of care (high, low, community) were assessed using analyses of variance with post hoc Bonferroni contrasts for pairwise comparisons.
Possible effect modification was assessed using analyses stratified by ER status of the tumour (positive vs negative), ER/PR status of the tumour (ER- or PR-positive vs ER-/PR-negative), and menopausal hormone therapy use at diagnosis (current vs past/never).
In patients undergoing chemotherapy, we assessed PD response using analyses of repeated measures but for pragmatic purposes, we limited analyses to regression – joint mixed effects modelling may better test for differences between biomarkers, but the complexity of such modelling was beyond the scope of this paper (Steele, 2008).
The cost-effectiveness of TKR in different patient subgroups was assessed using regression analyses of patient-level data from the Knee Arthroplasty Trial, a large, pragmatic randomised trial comparing knee prostheses.
RESULTS: Change in depressive symptoms was assessed using slopes analyses of intervention effects over time.
The effect of maternal and infant MTHFR C677T genotype on maternal and infant SLC6A4 and BDNF promoter methylation status at specific CpG sites was assessed using multiple analyses of covariance (MANCOVA) models with maternal EPDS score (depressed mood score) and SRI-treatment as covariates.
