assessed to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "assessed to" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey the idea of evaluating or determining something, but it is not commonly used in this form. Example: "The property was assessed to determine its market value."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

DAI was assessed to make an objective clinical assessment.

Progress in Orthodontics

The Karzai plot is assessed to be "probably true".

The Guardian

The Leafs then had to kill off a penalty assessed to him.

The New York Times - Sports

"The treatment is assessed to have been successful," the statement said.

The New York Times

And the scanners must be regularly assessed to ensure they are properly functioning.

The New York Times - Health

We are changing the way that performance is assessed to improve our support for individual development.

The Guardian

So-called "protected disclosures" are those assessed to be in the public interest.

The Guardian

"I think he knew no misconduct had been assessed to him.

The New York Times - Sports

Others are assessed to offset administrative costs, like probation supervision expenses.

The New York Times

For two weeks he was assessed, to find which wing he should be kept in.

The New Yorker

Any patient would be assessed to ensure that they had formed a "clear and settled intention" to end their life.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "assessed to" in formal writing. Opt for clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives like "evaluated for" or "appraised for".

Common error

The phrase "assessed to" can sound awkward and is often flagged as grammatically incorrect. Always double-check your writing and replace it with more accepted alternatives to maintain clarity and professionalism.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "assessed to" functions as a verb phrase, typically aiming to describe the process of evaluating or judging something. However, according to Ludwig, it's not considered standard English. It often appears in sentences where an evaluation or judgment is being made about a particular subject.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "assessed to" appears frequently in various contexts, Ludwig AI indicates that it's not considered standard English. It is used to express the act of evaluating something, but more grammatically sound alternatives like "evaluated for", "appraised for", or "examined to" are recommended. Predominantly found in scientific and news media sources, it's best to avoid "assessed to" in formal or professional writing to ensure clarity and correctness. When in doubt, opting for a more conventional phrase will enhance the overall quality and precision of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

evaluated for

Replaces "assessed to" with a more standard and grammatically correct phrase for indicating evaluation.

appraised for

Similar to "evaluated for", this phrase provides a grammatically sound alternative for determining value or quality.

evaluated in order to

Emphasizes the purpose of the evaluation more explicitly.

examined to

Suggests a detailed inspection or investigation to reach a conclusion.

investigated to

Implies a systematic or formal inquiry to uncover facts.

studied to

Focuses on a careful and thorough analysis for understanding.

analyzed for

Indicates a detailed examination of the components or elements.

judged to

Implies forming an opinion or conclusion based on evidence or criteria.

determined to

Highlights the process of reaching a firm decision or conclusion.

considered for

Suggests that something is being taken into account for a particular purpose.

FAQs

What's a better way to say "assessed to"?

Consider using alternatives like "evaluated for", "appraised for", or "examined to" depending on the specific context.

Is "assessed to" grammatically correct?

According to Ludwig AI, the phrase "assessed to" is not considered standard written English and may be perceived as grammatically incorrect. It's advisable to use alternative phrasing for clarity.

How can I use "evaluated for" instead of "assessed to"?

Instead of saying "The damage was assessed to be significant", you could say "The damage was "evaluated for" its significance". This provides a more direct and grammatically sound construction.

What's the difference between "assessed to" and "evaluated for"?

"Evaluated for" is a more standard and accepted way to express the idea of determining the value or quality of something. While "assessed to" might be understood, it's less common and can be considered grammatically awkward.