The phrase "assessed randomly" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a process where items or subjects are evaluated without a specific pattern or order.
Example: "The participants in the study were assessed randomly to ensure unbiased results."
Alternatives: "evaluated at random" or "analyzed randomly".
To minimize bias, animals were coded and assessed randomly.
Many patients with normal fasting and 2-h glucose levels have elevation in the middle of the OGTT (indeterminate glycemia [INDET]) or when assessed randomly or by continuous glucose monitoring.
Intervention practitioners received further quality assurance visits from the research nurses who observed and assessed randomly selected patient consultations in order to monitor and enhance the methodological quality measures of the health behaviour intervention, recording any deviations from the agreed standard [ 30].
The most common way to assess the validity of diagnoses in the NPR has been to assess randomly drawn cases through chart review, that is, the assessment of medical records to confirm diagnosis.
The Y/X-chromosome status of the spermatozoa was evaluated by assessing randomly selected visual fields.
The significance of the CAPS correlation values was assessed by randomly pairing sites of the alignment and building a distribution of correlation coefficients for 1,000,000 randomly paired sites against which we compared real correlation values.
The effects are not small: one study showed that an American worker who was among the bottom one-seventh in looks, as assessed by randomly chosen observers, earned 10 to 15 percent less per year than a similar worker whose looks were assessed in the top one-third — a lifetime difference, in a typical case, of about $230,000.
Here the importance of a predictor to the RFML model was assessed by randomly permuting the values of the factor within a validation dataset, and processing the validation data through the regression trees.
Following this, the combination of each scoring term was assessed by randomly drawing 1000 different weight combinations such that ((omega _{{mathrm{Frag}}} + omega _{{mathrm{RT}}} + omega _{{mathrm{Refs}}} = 1)) to determine the optimal relative contributions of each term for the best results.
In the fourth Stage (reliability study), eight raters assessed thirty randomly selected decision support technologies.
Significance was assessed by randomly permuting the labels for the deep and shallow species within each genus 100,000 times, to generate a null distribution of the test statistic.
