Level of anatomical knowledge was assessed on a multiple-choice questionnaire, in a sample of 722 participants, comprising approximately 100 patients in each of 6 different diagnostic groups and 133 in the general population, using a between-groups, cross-sectional design.
The level of knowledge of the nursing staff and physicians on MDROs was assessed by a multiple choice test at the beginning of the instructional courses.
> -wrap-foot> The concomitant impact of number of early relapses, first inter-attack interval and number of Year 3-secondary progression relapses on outcomes was assessed in a multiple model (Table 11).
The outcomes of patient admitted who required chronic renal dialysis, as compared with other patients, adjusted for case mix factors, were assessed with a multiple logistic regression model on ultimate hospital mortality.
Here, we compare lifetime rates of psychopathology between a community sample of individuals assessed on multiple occasions to their siblings who completed only a single diagnostic evaluation.
Such data is not contradictory where the metadata describes that a student can be assessed on multiple results from different examination bodies of the same year.
But the same data will be regarded as contradictory where the metadata describes that a student cannot be assessed on multiple results from different examination bodies of the same year.
Thus, these traits could also be assessed on multiple time points during the cropping cycle and represented as a function of time.
Mutant receptors were assessed on multiple criteria including cAMP production, agonist-mediated desensitization (which can provide an indirect measure of β-arrestin association [12]), cell-surface and total expression and human αCGRP binding in an attempt to determine the functional role of the residues within the protein.
Mutant CGRP receptors were assessed on multiple criteria including; cAMP accumulation, cell surface expression, total expression, agonist mediated internalization and αCGRP radioligand binding.
The interpretation of MDC90 is that 90% of truly stable patients will demonstrate random variation of less than this magnitude when assessed on multiple occasions.
