The phrase "assessed for documentation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where something is being evaluated or reviewed in relation to its documentation or record-keeping.
Example: "The project will be assessed for documentation to ensure all necessary records are in place before the final review."
Alternatives: "evaluated for documentation" or "reviewed for documentation".
Each article describing a DVT proportion was assessed for documentation in the methods section that intermittent pneumatic compression devices were utilized and whether DVT surveillance was routine.
A chart abstraction guide assessed for documentation of overall prognosis, which was defined to include: "life expectancy", "prognosis", "mortality", "mortality rate", "likelihood to live/likelihood to die", "survival", "life span", and "long-term outcome".
A total of 200 patients who visited the ED from 1 July to 31 August 2007 were selected randomly and their case sheets were assessed for the documentation of the details in the retained copy of the discharge summary as shown in Table 1.
Case sheets of 200 patients who visited the ED from 1 July to 31 August 2007 were selected randomly and were assessed for the documentation of the demographic and clinical details in the retained copy of the discharge summary by three medical records personnel independently.
Domains assessed for the station included: documentation of patient identification, allergies and the prescription of 7 drugs, 2 urgent once-only intravenous preparations, 3 routine and 2 as required.
The entire chart was examined to obtain data that could be found in different places – progress notes, growth charts, etc. Six outcome variables reflecting documentation were assessed for each chart audited: growth, nutrition, safety issues, developmental milestones, physical examination, and overall comprehensiveness.
If the parent did not provide such documentation, children were assessed for this study by a psychologist research-certified in the ADOS to confirm the diagnosis of an autism spectrum disorder.
For quality control (QC), each personal monitoring result was assessed for accuracy in flow rate, time, and completeness of documentation.
Most data will be extracted from ongoing documentations and patients' health records, some data will have to be specifically assessed for the purpose of the study.
This LRI PH WG, besides providing PH required data elements to the LRI, assessed a need for documentation of the broad landscape of public health data exchange transactions.
Safety was assessed by documentation of adverse effects.
