The phrase "assessed explicitly" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing evaluations or analyses that are clear and direct in their criteria or outcomes.
Example: "The project's success was assessed explicitly through a series of defined metrics and benchmarks."
Alternatives: "evaluated clearly" or "analyzed directly".
Potential implications of these findings include that energy scenarios could be associated with uncertainty that is presently neither assessed explicitly nor communicated adequately.
Pregnancy status was assessed explicitly by questions within the initial screening, and at scheduled follow-up phone calls, as described above.
A review of course materials from the five classes included in this study indicates that many of the eight concepts addressed by the BEDCI were either taught implicitly or taught and assessed explicitly in course homework, quizzes, and exams (Table 3).
We designed a laboratory experiment to assess explicitly whether seed choices depend on the size of both seeds and rodents.
Our integrated analysis is the first large-scale application assessing explicitly the performance of overrepresentation of predicted gene functions for the identification of potentially causal genes for plant traits in genomic regions obtained by QTL mapping.
The latter are predominantly developed as self-rating questionnaires, similar to personality inventories, and designed to capture general self concepts without specifying an elaborated link to pathology [ 8, 9, 48, 49], even in Akhtar & Samuel's ICI to assess explicitly "components of identity" [ 50].
In only 14.7% of capacity assessments were the MCA criteria for assessing capacity explicitly used.
Evaluation of university-based research already has a reasonably long tradition in the UK, but proposals to revise the framework for national evaluation aroused controversy in the academic community because they envisage assessing more explicitly than before the economic, social and cultural 'impact' of research as well as its scientific quality.
Neither test assesses memory explicitly and one of the two is not widely used in batteries testing patients for mild cognitive impairment.
The other two meta-analyses included only four [ 16] and five [ 17] randomized trials, respectively, made no attempt to find unpublished studies, made no assessment of the possible impact of publication bias, nor explicitly assessed the validity of those trials included.
The transparency criterion 'Identification of uncertain developments' addresses the associated requirement to communicate those uncertainties which are explicitly assessed in the study.
