The phrase "assessed clearly" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the clarity or transparency of an evaluation or assessment process.
Example: "The results of the study were assessed clearly, allowing for easy interpretation of the data."
Alternatives: "evaluated transparently" or "analyzed distinctly".
We don't ask for much just for clarity and stability so students' work can be assessed clearly and fairly.
The dataset developed is fully validated against conventional procedures while the error induced in design by the use of older design aids is comparatively assessed, clearly highlighting the necessity for a new design charts dataset at least under certain loading and reinforcement configurations.
Another advantage of this approach is that the index ensures that a certain number of basic indicators are assessed clearly before an overall classification is assigned to a given water body.
Despite this, had the guidelines we assessed clearly referenced their source guideline, they should have scored higher in this domain.
However, the association between HPV 16 infection and esophageal cancer in Chinese population has not yet been assessed clearly.
Following a structured set of item generation principles, candidate daytime and overnight items intended to assess clearly observable signs associated with RSV infection were drafted and subsequently evaluated in iterative rounds of cognitive testing with an additional 23 caregivers (15 nonhospitalized children, 8 hospitalized children) to pretest and refine the draft GRCD questionnaire.
Additional studies are needed to assess clearly the relationship between UGT genotypes and hormonal status in healthy women and women with breast cancer.
Abnormal GER was objectively assessed and clearly associated to lung diseases [ 14, 15].
The studies need to ensure that the definitions of cognitive impairment and type of pain that is being assessed are clearly defined, to enable comparisons across populations.
The recovery rate of cellulose regenerated from the OES at different values of χ [AMIM]Cl was assessed, and clearly indicated there was no significant difference between the recovery rates (P = 0.3229) at χ [AMIM]Cl from 0 to 1.0.
Thus, as proposed in the review by Osawa and Singh [ 27], our prospectively assessed data clearly identify septic patients as a defined subgroup in the ICU population being at high risk for CMV reactivation.
