Sentence examples for assessed by the difference between from inspiring English sources

Children's resilience was assessed by the difference between their actual score and the score predicted by their level of SES deprivation in the E-Risk Study, an epidemiological cohort of 1,116 five-year-old twin pairs.

The decrease of pain intensity as assessed by the difference between NRS scores was the reference parameter for estimating the efficacy of drugs either immediately (T2h = first 2 h) as in the following 24 48 h (T24h and T48h).

For L + ewes, this bias in the estimates of the additive polygenic values, assessed by the difference between EBV and EBV|FecL, was very large and can contribute to biased selection for polygenic values.

Finally, we explored the relationship between serum albumin and gamma globulin as assessed by the difference between total protein and albumin, or by individual immunoglobulin subgroups, that is, IgG, IgA and IgM.

A sample size of 20 patients was sufficient to provide at least 90% power to detect a 50% attenuation of the LAR as assessed by the difference between FF/VI 100/25 μg and placebo in both minimum and weighted mean FEV1 (4–10 h).

Mechanical loading-related increases in trabecular BV/TV and cortical bone volume, as assessed by the difference between the right loaded tibiae and their contra-lateral non-loaded controls, were not significantly influenced by treatment with risedronate, even when given at a high dose (15 or 150 μg/kg/day) (Figs. 3 and 4).

Test-retest reliability was assessed by the differences between test and retest scores using a paired-sample t test and was further assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

The statistical tests that can be used to distinguish nuwts from the bacterial genome are limited because the data is neither unimodal nor normal, as assessed by the differences between the mean, mode, and median for the data (Tables  1 and 2).

However, independently of this association between urbanization and human disease, fairly small differences in avian community diversity, as assessed by the difference in diversity between neighboring counties, explained a surprisingly large amount (approximately 50%) of the between-county difference in human incidence of WNV.

The estimation of the incision that occurred during the degradation phase was assessed by the difference in elevation between gravel surfaces, whereas the changes introduced by restoration interventions in two reaches were evaluated through the comparison of topographic cross sections surveyed in year 2000 and a high-resolution bathymetric LiDAR survey flown in late 2012.

Genistein-mediated global changes in methylation levels were assessed by the difference of the log2 (HpaIIr/McrBCr) values between genistein-treated and untreated (control) cells; a high linear correlation was detected (Pearson correlation coefficient, 0.923) for the individual probes between the two datasets (Figure 1).