Sentence examples for assess potential outcomes from inspiring English sources

The group of students was administered a questionnaire designed ad hoc to assess potential outcomes at different levels: general, educational, social, affective, cognitive, physical and negative affectivity.

Qualitative research has shown that goals on user participation are articulated vaguely and considered implicit by organisations, making it challenging to assess potential outcomes [ 47].

The main benefit of using potential outcomes is that even in the absence of actual patient harm, judgments can be made about severity; however, assessing potential outcomes is likely to be more subjective.

We also looked at a limited set of outcomes and did not assess potential affective outcomes.

This study, which included men and women, enabled the examination of the dose-response relation with total mortality at concentrations >90 and >120 nmol/L although with only a small proportion of the population with concentrations >120 nmol/L (n = 152; 1%) and >150 nmol (n = 21; 0.1%); we did not have power to assess potential adverse outcomes above concentrations of 150 nmol/L.

Several studies have examined the NHANES data to assess potential relationships between outcomes such as obesity and urinary concentrations of various chemicals or their metabolites (Bhandari et al. 2013; Carwile and Michels 2011; Eng et al. 2013; Hatch et al. 2008; LaKind et al. 2012; Melzer et al. 2010, 2012; Trasande et al. 2012; Twum and Wei 2011).

The aim of this study was to assess potential biomarkers to predict outcomes for people with IPF.

Few studies have longer than 3 y of follow-up, whereas studies of hypertension or diabetes management typically have 4 8 y of follow-up to assess potential improvements in cardiovascular outcomes.100, 101 Losses to follow-up were typically 30 60%, whereas <20% loss to follow-up, a minimum requirement for clinical trials,34, 102 was satisfied by only six studies.

Classically, toxicologists assess potential chronic adverse health outcomes resulting from chemical exposures by using gross end points such as body or organ weight changes and histopathologic observations.

Few studies on orlistat have had longer than 3 years of follow-up, whereas studies of hypertension or diabetes management typically have 4 8 years of follow-up to assess potential improvements in cardiovascular outcomes.

To assess potential mediators, youth treatment outcome research has until now been oriented toward the use of self-reports (e.g., Beauchaine et al. 2005; Kaufman et al. 2005; Kazdin and Wassell 1999; Kendall and Treadwell 2007; Kolko et al. 2000; Stice et al. 2007; Treadwell and Kendall 1996).