The absence of mobility assessed manually and by a manual torque test.
The criteria of success are as follows [3, 24, 29, 30]: The absence of mobility assessed manually and by a manual torque test The absence of peri-implant radiolucency The absence of continuous pain or suppuration around the implant The absence of deep (>5 mm) pockets adjacent to the implant Bone loss <4 mm.
Recently, passive musculotendinous stiffness (MTS) has been assessed manually in the field; however, when conducting these types of assessments, the stretching velocity must be controlled to avoid eliciting the stretch reflex, which can be observed by increased electromyographic (EMG) amplitude of the stretched muscles and greater resistive torque (indicating the assessment is no longer passive).
Since there is no algorithmic relationship between non-systematic identifiers and structures, the correctness of these identifiers can only be assessed manually, which has proven cumbersome [1].
Due to the lack of standard measures (such as accuracy, consistency, comprehensiveness, coverage, accessibility, reliability) for quality evaluation, the quality of data sources is either not assessed or just assessed manually.
The correctness of non-systematic identifiers (i.e., whether an identifier matches the associated structure) can only be assessed manually, which is cumbersome, but it is possible to automatically check their ambiguity (i.e., whether an identifier matches more than one structure).
For statistical analysis, the nuclear pattern of EGFP-Gadd45a was assessed manually (n = 35 50).
The SNP were extracted, automatically validated and then assessed manually, when we were unable to conclude the region was again sequenced (see below).
The GRE T2*-weighted MRI images were displayed in semi-dark conditions using an Agfa IMPAX PACS system, and assessed manually by a clinical neurologist (SMG) who was trained in CMB rating by an experienced consultant neuroradiologist (HRJ).
All ART documentation is assessed manually.
