The phrase "assess acceptability of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when evaluating whether something meets certain standards or criteria for acceptance.
Example: "Before proceeding with the project, we need to assess the acceptability of the proposed changes."
Alternatives: "evaluate the suitability of" or "determine the validity of".
Consent rate will be calculated and descriptive statistics (including number, percentage and 95% CI) for each item on the acceptability questions will be generated to assess acceptability of the use of the touch screen computer health assessment questionnaire.
Because GBS vaccines would be the first to specifically target pregnant women, we sought to assess acceptability of a hypothetical GBS vaccine.
This study was performed to assess feasibility of subcutaneous DMPA self-injection in Senegal; objectives were to (1) measure the proportion of participants who self-injected competently 3 months after training, (2) measure the proportion who self-injected on time (defined conservatively as within 7 days of reinjection date), and (3) assess acceptability of self-injection.
Specific probes were developed for each of these stages, adapted from examples proposed elsewhere [ 20] with additional questions to assess acceptability of items.
The PN/HCAs were also interviewed prior to, and after, both the training and delivery to assess acceptability of the training and intervention materials.
To assess acceptability of the intervention (Aim 1), the project manager will observe two randomly selected sessions per month to assess whether the sessions are being taught by the protocol.
It is evident that there is a lack of standardisation in study design as well as the assessment methods used in assessing acceptability of medicines in children and older populations.
This approach has advantages over the traditional 'prescriptive' code-based approach for assessing acceptability of designs, which is normal practice today for assessing wheelchair accessibility.
This study assessed acceptability of a new 3.0-mL prefilled insulin pen device, the Humulin®/Humalog® Pen, as a method of delivering human insulin.
If it is true that the empathy network is encoding morally relevant harmful outcomes (as shown by preceding results) and harmful outcomes matter more for blaming as compared to assessing acceptability of third-party moral violations, the empathy network should be more active for blame judgments as compared to acceptability judgments.
Prior behavioral research on the judgment of accidental harm cannot distinguish two alternative regulation hypotheses: information about harmful outcomes may be either (i) selectively down-regulated while assessing acceptability of accidents, or instead (ii) selectively up-regulated while making blame judgments.
