From [12]: "A famous theorem concerning Lyndon words asserts that any word w can be factorized in a unique way as a non-increasing product of Lyndon words, i.e. written w = x 1 x 2 ⋯ x n with x 1 ≥ x 2 ≥ ⋯ ≥ x n.
Patañjali asserts that words in reality are eternal (nitya), and that means they must be absolutely free from change or transformation and fixed in their nature.
Frege writes that "it is enough if the sentence as whole has meaning; thereby also its parts obtain their meanings".[13] On the face of it, this asserts that words have their meanings in virtue of the meaning of sentences in which they occur as constituents.
As Kågeson[108] asserts, this wording served to replace ACEA's condition in an earlier outline proposal that 'no negative measures against diesel-fuelled cars' should be taken.
Yet opponents of posting the Ten Commandments and the national motto in classrooms argue that those who assert the words are nonreligious are naive or disingenuous.
But informal remarks asserting that words and deeds by government could not permanently move currencies caused the dollar to plunge.World trade contracted by 1% in volume in 2001, after a bumper year in 2000, according to figures from the World Trade Organisation.
Among them is University of Michigan law professor Catherine MacKinnon whose anti-porn diatribe Only Words asserts: "Pornography, in the feminist view, is a form of forced sex".
As Russell writes, "Ordinary language is totally unsuited for expressing what physics really asserts, since the words of everyday life are not sufficiently abstract.
Ms Balding asserts that the word "dyke" is "too often used as a pejorative and insulting term".
Wright justifies this position on Fregean grounds by appealing to Frege's Context Principle, which asserts that a word has no meaning (reference) except in the context of a proposition (truth).
