Human factor expert, Prof. Erik Hollnagel, asserts it in even stronger terms: the Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-off principle, or rather dilemma, contends that one can hardly do it perfectly well.
I welcome this truly Hindu and Indian symbolism, and even assert it because for too long Hindu symbolism has been only perceived in today's virulently Hinduphobic media discourse as a negative thing (He said he's fasting! That's wink-wink code for Hindutva!).
The engraved line is so sharp and clean that it asserts itself even if cut over a densely etched area.
But, like Occupy, it asserts that it's OK – exciting, even – to consider how society could be structured differently.
It even asserts that all of our problems could be solved if only protestors were nicer to cops, as if that's the missing link here.
We have never heard it even asserted, that any restrictions should be imposed on our selling transactions with the United States, or with France, or Spain, or the Brazils, because those countries have not abolished slavery; and, so long as we are permitted to sell to them, it follows that we must also buy from them.
However, Edward F. Wente asserts that, even with explicit references to women reading letters, it is possible that women employed others to write documents.
Yet on the occasion of the war's bicentennial, this exhibition asserts that it had an even more profound impact than this list might suggest: It shaped a sense of American identity.
Instead, Thomson asserts that even by 1837 when he opened his species notebook, Darwin's aims were "less defined" (p. 182).
For example, one test study guide asserts that even numbers are characterized as integer multiples of two, but zero is "neither even nor odd".
