Sentence examples for assertions of this book from inspiring English sources
So what, then, are the untempered assertions of this book based on?
There are wacky and sometimes self-serving assertions in this book.
The assertion on the dust cover of this book, that through Fechner "psychology developed into an 'exact' science susceptible of mathematical treatment", is, to put it mildly, misleading.
Other assertions made in this book are more poorly sourced.
There is an odd intemperance about the tone of this book, with vociferous assertion often replacing argument.
This is again similar to the view that Hobbes held and repeats the assertions of Collins' first book An Essay concerning the Use of Reason.
As part of the chronology, this book gathers together some of the more remarkable assertions of various creationists.
The White House press secretary, Dana M. Perino, said early Friday that the White House "would not comment on any of the assertions in the book," adding that "we have a good idea of what Prime Minister Maliki is thinking, because he tells us very frankly and very candidly, as often as he can".
Many of the assertions in the book are based on anonymous sources.
President Bush's press secretary, Dana M. Perino, said that the White House "would not comment on any of the assertions in the book".
