Even more annoying is the book's penchant for cheerleading with unqualified assertions like, "The kids have got it right".
Other highlights of the conversation included multiple statements that began with "Rape is bad, but…" and assertions like, "You can overcome abuse, but you can't overcome having your reputation squashed". .
An assertion like this in the context of a debate on trade is laughable.
Much of the argument revolved around whether reasonable investors would want to know about false and outlandish assertions like the one about Satanism so long as the assertions might affect the price of securities.
I'm getting tired of assertions like that of Representative Ernest Istook Jr. -- "As prayer has gone out of schools, guns, knives, drugs and gangs have come in" -- with the unsupported implication that there is some causal connection between these events ("House Rejects Drive to Allow Formal Prayer in the Schools," news article, June 5).
On the other hand, Dr. Wicklund has little use for requirements like 24-hour waiting periods, or for assertions like those of Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who said in a recent Supreme Court decision on abortion that the government had an interest in protecting women from their own decisions in the matter.
Making assertions like the previous statement will help you build your argument, by proving it or: Counter argue, 'but have your senses never deceived you before?
Avoid airy assertions like "every customer needs this" and gobbledygook like "next generation platform"–they mean nothing and undermine your credibility.
Avoid airy assertions like "every customer needs this" and gobbledygook like "next generation platform --they mean nothing and undermine your credibility.
It was called "Godwin's Law of Nazi Analogies", and the assertion went like this: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one".
