The assertions (1.5 - 1.12) in [7], Theorem 1.1, concern the spaces ((A_{0}+A_{1}, A_{0}cap A_{1})_{theta, p}), and the goal of this paper is to extend these assertions by means of replacing the classical scale ((A_{0}, A_{1})_{theta, p}) by the general scale ((A_{0}, A_{1})_{Phi}).
The proposed method generates the clusters of assertion-checkers by means of exploring the logic-cones set of each assertion-checker.
One type concerns the decision whether or not an assertion has been made by means of an utterance.
Perhaps the best way of capturing the cognitive nature of assertion is to to give a theory of the cognitive features of normal communication by means of assertion.
The 'second' humanism after that of the ancient Classical World itself, involved the process of national renewal and national self-assertion after the onslaught of Napoleon by means of an education that hinged on the Classics and aimed at — the equally untranslatable — 'Bildung', a moulding of the mind and soul, promoted by figures such as Wilhelm v. Humboldt.
There must also be surface properties, which are the properties by which we can tell whether an utterance is an assertion, for instance that it is made by means of uttering a sentence in the indicative mood.
Both MacFarlane (2011) and García-Carpintero (2013) argue that we should distinguish between what is said and what is asserted, and that this allows us to maintain that an indirect assertion that swans are black are made by means of directly saying that the speaker commits himself.
There is, however, no clear syntactic restriction on speech acts of denial, as denials can be realized not only by assertions of negated sentences but, for example, also by means of irony.
By means of the above lemma, we may sharpen the convergence assertion (5.24).
Yet this assertion is constantly challenged by the very fact that while he achieves power by means of writing and dictating, these very same methods can be used by others to dispute his authority.
By means of Lemma 2.5, it is also possible to prove the assertion of [[1], Theorem 3.7] under the weaker assumption on Ω of the present paper.
