Sentence examples for assertions are presented from inspiring English sources

The main results of this article about positivity or negativity of elements in the nth row of Green's matrix are formulated in Section 3. General assertions are presented in Theorems 3.1 and 3.2.

Although several assertions were presented as the maximum principles for delay differential equations, they can be only interpreted in a corresponding sense as analogs of classical ones for ordinary differential equations and do not imply important corollaries, reached on the basis of the finite-dimensional fundamental systems.

And so the age-old 'Was it all a dream (or hallucination)?' assertion is presented.

Evidence for this assertion is presented through the review of several elegant stable isotope studies and by taking stock of what has been learned from radioisotope investigations when spatial aspects of metabolism were considered.

The knowledge account of assertion is presented, defended, and used both to undermine an advanced form of the warranted assertability objection, the generality objection, and to provide a second positive argument for contextualism: an argument from the variation in warranted assertability conditions of simple (non-knowledge-ascribing) claims.

A local version of this assertion is presented as Theorem 6. See also Remark 3.ii and Conjecture 1.

A compound was classified as a non-structural cardiotoxin if no reports of the above clinical assertions were present in the FDA approval package.

The proofs of formulated assertions of Sections 2 and 3 are presented in Section 4. The main idea of our approach is to construct a corresponding scalar functional differential equation of the first order x n ′ ( t ) + ( B x n ) ( t ) = f * ( t ), t ∈ [ 0, ω ], (1.12).

Before each debate, audience members are presented with an assertion and are asked to vote on whether or not they agree with the assertion.

Some of the ideas of assertion will be presented below.

The structure of the variables used in the experimental design defines the structure of the data gathered in the experiments; this in turn structures the interpretative assertions that may be presented as experimental conclusions.