Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
The following assertion is valid.
The IRS asked a federal judge to issue an order blocking the two from filing returns claiming the tax credit unless the assertion is valid.
This assertion is valid as long as both individuals are endowed with the same health care needs Moreover, every agent with a medical disposition (min {mathcal {M}}) makes her choice with (u_{f}^{m}(c,alpha )), but she derives utility from (u_{f+t}^{m}(c,alpha )), where (tge 0).
Thus, a b c ∈ C ( t, s ) ( A ). Consequently, C ( t, s ) ( A ) is a bi-ideal of S. Therefore, we conclude that if an IFS A = 〈 x, μ A, γ A 〉 of S satisfies the three conditions (e1), (e2) and (e3), then the following assertion is valid.
It should be emphasized that the above assertion is valid for the random sum of ν i.i.d.i.d
Similar(55)
"None of these assertions are valid".
These assertions are valid for all sensory modalities.
Then the following assertions are valid: (a) if the inverse problem (1.1)–(1.4) is solvable, then so is the Eq. (1.8).
The following assertions are valid (see Methods).
Thus assertion (1) is valid.
Let us assume that this assertion is not valid meaning that.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com