The phrase "asserting that your" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when you want to indicate that someone is making a claim or statement about something that belongs to or is associated with the person being addressed.
Example: "In your argument, you are asserting that your findings are conclusive and should be accepted by the scientific community."
Alternatives: "claiming that your" or "stating that your".
But I tell them writing doesn't have to be some hubristic act of asserting that your life has been more extraordinary than someone else's.
It involves strutting around a lot, asserting that your way is best, refusing to listen to compromise and oozing charisma.
Some people do not recommend saying anything to the effect of abiding by your beliefs, asserting that your beliefs are a personal decision and that your host and other guests might feel insulted because by saying that you're trying to do the right thing by not drinking, you're implying that they are doing the wrong thing by consuming alcohol.
You may assert that your friend is a splendid contractor, but I'm skeptical of your certainty.
This rule immediately asserts that your published findings should communicate only relevant information to deduce general rules.
It's not as if there are wrong answers, but you must assert that your answers are the right ones.
He asserted that your trial had been fair and that you are a criminal, but I didn't find him very convincing, and I wonder if he really believed what he was saying.
If you show a loss for three years out of five, the IRS is more likely to assert that your buying and selling say, of Star Wars memorabilia is really just a hobby, not a business.
Instead, you assert that your biggest regret is that you did not go big enough at times, and you have advised others that if they do not invest big, they are not innovating.
McCain will assert that your election will create a "crisis of confidence" in the U.S. military given your position on the surge.
But he may go a step further and assert that your embrace of tough diplomacy is nothing more than semantics to camouflage the controversy.
