The phrase "asserting that information" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the act of stating or declaring specific information as true or valid.
Example: "The researcher is asserting that information based on the latest findings in the study."
Alternatives: "claiming that information" or "stating that information".
The president of the Boston Fed, Eric S. Rosengren, has published research asserting that information collected by bank supervisors can improve the forecasts of inflation and unemployment that Fed policy makers consider when setting interest rates.
However, a proposal by the neuroscientist Giulio Tononi (2008) goes further in identifying consciousness with integrated information and asserting that information integration of the relevant sort is both necessary and sufficient for consciousness regardless of the substrate in which is realized which need not be neural or biological.
It may also be in the sense of a point of origin for the transfer of information: the central dogma of molecular biology, which represents a 1950s reformulation of Weismannism in terms of information theory, asserts that information travels unidirectionally from nucleic acids to protein, and never vice versa.
Robert P. McCulloch released his own statement asserting that "no information or evidence has been released by the grand jury" itself, adding that he nonetheless found the media leaks "exasperating".
In a series of letters last week, Yates' lawyer, David O'Neil, accused the Trump Justice Department of trying to silence Yates by asserting that "all information Ms. Yates received or actions she took in her capacity as Deputy Attorney General and acting Attorney General are client confidences that she may not disclose absent written consent of the department". .
The government would not turn over the accident report, asserting that it contained information about the plane's secret electronic equipment.
Officials at the Musée des Beaux-Arts in Orleans, France, for example, said that the Register approached the museum in 2003, asserting that it had information about an Alfred Sisley painting that had been stolen from the museum.
Apple has been mostly quiet about the specifics of how the tech works, while generally asserting that the fingerprint information never goes to a server, and only remains on the phone itself in a "secure enclave" which isn't accessible by the rest of the system or third-party devs.
But the government, asserting that the report included information about the plane's secret mission and the equipment that it was testing, refused to reveal it.
While fraudulent transactions are certainly unfair, simply asserting that buying access to information in advance of others is somehow unfair does not necessarily make it illegal.
