The phrase "asserted include" is not correct in written English.
It seems to be a combination of two words that do not form a coherent expression.
Example: "The report asserted include several key findings that were previously overlooked."
Alternatives: "claimed to include" or "stated to include".
Many potential customers, they assert, including some who were burned after Ma Bell's breakup, incorrectly believe that non-A.T.&T.
Mr. Garrido also repeatedly displayed disturbing behavior toward women while on parole, the complaint asserts, including contacting the victim of the 1976 kidnapping and rape that resulted in his first being sent to federal prison.
Under Sexton's leadership, the school has embarked on a series of misguided propositions, opponents assert, including opening satellite campuses overseas in Shanghai and Abu Dhabi.
The problems have been fixed, he asserts -- including what had been a chronic problem with VA care: losing track of patients.
2 A difference in the study site locations may partly explain this; ASSERT included only centres in North America and Western Europe, whereas our trial included centres in countries known to have higher TB incidence.
And Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the House, asserted that including contraception in the stimulus package could reduce government spending.
The term Palestine has been associated variously and sometimes controversially with this small region, which some have asserted also includes Jordan.
And while the design for the memorial will inevitably be chosen by committee, which many designers and architects assert should include a strong presence of victims and survivors, Mr. Manfredi said, "it's important that whatever art is done, it's not done by committee".
Mathews dictates that the process due in any given instance is determined by weighing "the private interest that will be affected by the official action" against the government's asserted interest, "including the function involved" and the burdens the government would face in providing greater process.
Judge Prost criticized the majority for failing to inquire whether the asserted claims included an "inventive concept" and improperly devising a new approach to evaluate patent eligiblity, i.e. a "manifestly evident" approach.
