The phrase "asserted in the case" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to claims or statements made within a legal context or specific case.
Example: "The defendant's innocence was asserted in the case, leading to further investigation."
Alternatives: "claimed in the case" or "stated in the case".
Recently, Larsen- Freeman (2016) asserted: In the case of the classroom ecology, the components are not only the agents, that is, the teacher and the students (and all of their accompanying thoughts, embodied actions, emotions, behaviors, dispositions, identities, social capital, etc)., but they also include properties of the physical and temporal environment as well.
It was further asserted in the case of Salgo v. Leland Stanford University that: "A physician may violate his duty to his patient and subject himself to liability if he withholds any facts which are necessary to form the basis of an intelligent consent by the patient to proposed treatment" [ 18].
Judge Kavanaugh, who was largely supported by a second judge in the three-member panel, A. Raymond Randolph, added that "it is no overstatement to say that our constitutional system of separation of powers would be significantly altered if we were to allow executive and independent agencies to disregard federal law in the manner asserted in this case by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission".
However the US does not have an equivalent of the UK's Data Protection Act or other privacy legislation which is being asserted in the UK case.
UnitedHealth asserted in the same case that medical reports that surgery centers submitted to it listed conflicting height and weight for a weight-loss surgery patient.
However, an inconsistency cannot be asserted in the present case taking into account the confidence intervals of the thermodynamic parameters and the fact that the PPP reactions operate close to the equilibrium.
The right standard for managing this uneasy balance was asserted in the Pentagon papers case by the late Justice Potter Stewart, when he wrote for the decisive centre of the US supreme court.
While the UK government had pursued a controversial policy of aid for trade since the late 1970s, the World Development Movement asserted in the Pergau dam case that the primary purpose of British aid must be the economic benefit of the recipient country and the welfare of its people.
"It's always hard to tell how current events play into a justice's perception, but the connections being so visibly drawn will only help in making clear that the rights that are being asserted in the Hobby Lobby case have very broad and troubling implications," she said.
This is not surprising; the claims it asserts in this case are entirely and completely without merit.
