The phrase "asserted by its" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing claims or statements made by a particular entity or individual.
Example: "The theory was asserted by its proponents as a valid explanation for the phenomenon."
Alternatives: "claimed by its" or "stated by its".
First, the United Nations didn't "create" Israel — sovereignty was asserted by its provisional government at the termination of British authority in the territory — nor indeed was the 1947 General Assembly partition resolution even legally binding.
Yet, scientific socialism was asserted by its followers to be a species of ultimate philosophical truth rather than, as Hook's pragmatic interpretation required, a set of fallible and corrigible hypotheses about the historical situation, including contemporaneous economic processes and their eventual outcomes.
Furthermore, the distribution of GC-content is highly concentrated, as asserted by its limited standard deviation; therefore, the expected number of attempts required to generate a valid sequence when [respectively ] grows like [respectively, i.e. a constant], leading to the announced complexities.
The tale is held together, she asserts, by its attractive central character, and points out that, like many girls' books of the period, it is set indoors and revolves around household chores and duties.
The availability of strengthened contrary readings for apparent contradictory negation has long been recognized, dating back to classical rhetoricians of the 4th century on the figure of litotes, in which an affirmative is indirectly asserted by negating its contrary (Hoffmann 1987).
Abelard calls statements propositions (propositio) and what is asserted by a statement its dictum.
The claims asserted by Power.com in its countersuit are without merit and we will fight them aggressively.
The legitimacy of the Établissement Français du Sang (EFS) in cell and tissue engineering activities is established, it is recognized by most specialists and by regulatory authorities and has been asserted by the orientations of its "contrat d'objectifs et de moyens".
It was further asserted by the Government that Article XXII could be repealed because it had not been entrenched.
But the court has declined several opportunities to extend its ruling to protect other rights asserted by gun owners.
But the privacy principle asserted by article 12 and other human rights conventions should have stopped it in its tracks in the first place.
