The phrase "assert that knowledge" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the act of stating or claiming knowledge about a particular subject or fact.
Example: "In her thesis, she aims to assert that knowledge is not only acquired through experience but also through education."
Alternatives: "claim that knowledge" or "declare that knowledge".
This idea, that knowledge is identical with its object, is dimly reflected in the modern formula for expressing one of the necessary conditions of knowledge: A knows that p only if it is true that p. To assert that knowledge and its object must be identical raises a question: In what way is knowledge "in" a person?
In the article "Making Room for Collaboration" by Herman Miller, the authors assert that knowledge transfer is an essential element of innovation.
More specifically, distributed cognition places emphasis on the social aspects of cognition and asserts that knowledge is distributed by placing memories, facts, or knowledge on objects, individuals, and tools in the environment they work.
He asserted that knowledge should freely advance through experiment and observation frequently chiding scholars for not including accurate experimental data in their papers while insisting that hypotheses are, at best, probable explanations.
On this point, Vega-Jurado et al. (2008, p. 397) asserts that knowledge from universities, public research institutes, and technology institutes is not immediately applicable and, as a consequence, a firm needs to develop competences that will allow it to access and exploit it efficiently.
A well-known saying of the Prophet Muhammad asserts that knowledge is equally obligatory for males and females -- which has allowed for considerable Muslim receptivity toward providing education for girls and women alongside their male counterparts through the centuries.
We assert that is bounded.
We adopted a constructionist epistemology during this research, which asserts that people construct knowledge through their interactions with one another and the world.
Moreover, the hypothesis would suggest that the authors wish to explain why some expectant mothers and fathers seek care while other don't; asserting that lack of knowledge and awareness may be one factor.
As a theory of knowledge, reliabilism asserts that justification is not necessary for knowledge; rather, reliably produced true belief (provided the notion of reliability is suitably refined to rule out Gettier cases) is sufficient for it.[8] When we discuss the nature of justification, we must distinguish between two different issues: First, what do we mean when we use the word 'justification'?
So when Gill asserts that "M.
