He will be aided in this by one of the worst conventions in political reporting — the habit of asserting that a given occurrence "provides fodder" for a politician's attacks or arguments, simply by virtue of the fact that the politician will try to use it that way, regardless of whether facts or logic support it.
It seems clear to us from visiting the country that most Georgians envision themselves as European; in fact, we witnessed that both young and old would react with great offense if we asserted that a given aspect of Georgian culture was Asian or Middle Eastern.
But critics assert that given its partial ownership by airlines that supply three-quarters of all domestic air travel, Orbitz could allow its participating airlines to set anti-competitive fare structures.
In this respect, Pilling et al. [5] were correct to assert that given that formal analysis of their data "would lack the power to detect anything other than very large treatment effects", a formal analysis "would be potentially misleading".
They assert that in a given interdependence configuration, teams may have different perceptions about task interdependence.
But the modern path has many possible endpoints, and it seems like an abdication of moral judgment to just practice determinism and assert that wherever a given developed country's birthrate ends up — slightly above replacement level, slightly below, or in the depths plumbed by countries like Japan — must represent the best of all possible worlds.
In particular, the theorem asserts that for a given triangle ABC and points L, M, and N that lie on the sides AB, BC, and CA, respectively, a necessary and sufficient condition for the three lines from vertex to point opposite (AM, BN, CL) to intersect at a common point (be concurrent) is that the following relation hold between the line segments formed on the triangle:BM∙CN∙AL = MC∙NA∙LB.
A stronger version makes an in principle claim about our human capacities and thus asserts that given our human cognitive limits we will never be able to bridge the gap.
The organization asserts that given what we know about the link between climate change and children's health, "failure to take prompt, substantive action would be an act of injustice to all children".
