The phrase "assembly interaction" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to discussions about collaborative processes, events, or systems where components come together to interact or function.
Example: "The assembly interaction between the various departments was crucial for the success of the project."
Alternatives: "collaborative engagement" or "joint operation".
The human body-seat system includes the three-dimensional data of body based on anatomy and anthropometry, three-dimensional data of seat and adjustable assembly interaction between body and seat based on human body kinematics.
To rule out the possibility that the deletion and mutation may render detrimental effect on the overall structure of the M protein and its interaction with other viral proteins that are essential for virion assembly, interaction of the Mm1 mutant with the E protein was tested by co-immunoprecipitation.
These proteins were shown to play various roles, including assistance in ribosome assembly, interaction with translation initiation factors, stabilization of the ribosome structure, and more [ 1, 2].
ORF2 encodes the viral capsid protein of 660 amino acids consists of three linear domains and forms homodimers that is responsible for virion assembly, interaction with target cells, and immunogenicity [ 16],[ 17].
Prior to film assembly, interactions between film components were thoroughly examined.
Traditional structural methodologies fail to fully describe neuronal IF assembly, interactions and resulting function due to IFs structural plasticity, particularly in their C-terminal domains.
For this simulation, single cell phase and rate fields were assumed to be perfectly remapped, so that any changes are purely due to assembly interactions.
While assembly interactions initially entrain and amplify theta oscillations in the population compared to independent cells, after remapping these interactions disrupt theta activity and cause a lower overall activity level.
The independence of each neuron naturally explains the robustness of phase precession against intrahippocampal perturbations (Zugaro et al., 2005), an observation which is difficult to reconcile with models based on assembly interactions.
Note that, while assembly interactions improve phase coding in single cells in the initial environment, after remapping these same interactions disrupt phase precession and cause a lower (circular-linear) correlation between spike phase and animal location than that generated by independent cells.
This type of avidity effect is very likely necessary for SAS-6 oligomerisation, as the self-assembly interaction strength of this protein is weak (Kd ∼100 μM, see Kitagawa et al. Cell, 2011).
