Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
CABOG assemblies were compared with reference genomes and also to the outputs from other assemblers.
For proper comparison between the assemblies, the results of mapped cDNA for the respective assemblies were compared with those for TIGR4.
The contigs from the different assemblies were compared with the same custom database using BLASTx [ 85].
Our budgerigar genome assemblies were compared with the zebra finch, chicken, and falcon genomes [ 15- 17].
The Blat mappings of the assemblies were compared with the Ensembl annotations of the corresponding species.
A total of 738 Arabidopsis FL-cDNA supported alternatively spliced assemblies were compared with 829 reference assemblies (Table 5).
Similar(51)
Pennycress genomic scaffolds >75 kb long, representing 241 Mb (>70%) of the assembly were compared with the 241 Mb reference genome of E. salsugineum.
The 66,210 predicted gene sequences in G. max (Glyma1.01 genome assembly) were compared with the predicted genes in the Arabidopsis genome (TAIR v. 8) [ 57] using TBLASTX (E < 10-6, [ 58].
The assembly was compared with the reference PAO1 genome (NCBI reference sequence NC_002516) using BLAST and the comparison visualised using ACT to search for gene acquisition or loss events.
The obtained results on current constriction resistances from numerical calculations on a 3D reconstruction of a Ni YSZ anode/YSZ electrolyte assembly is compared with existing models with analytical expressions.
To identify transcripts derived from rRNA, each assembly was compared with cnidarian rRNA sequences using BLASTn.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com