The phrase "assemblies number" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be a misphrasing and may need clarification or rewording to convey the intended meaning.
Example: "The assemblies number for this project is 42."
Alternatives: "number of assemblies" or "count of assemblies."
Try a simple homemade winter kale pesto with roasted tomatoes on Ryvita or similar: a great desk assembly number.
Directly elected members of the assembly number 21, triple the number of members on the city council, the minimum required by Portuguese law.
The P -value for a particular alignment a is estimated as where is the total number of possible contig pairs, x is the assembly number and n is the total number of assemblies.
1997) to map the consensus sequences of polymorphic loci from data set 1 to the two most complete bird genomes available online, the chicken (Gallus gallus) with Ensembl assembly number 4.0 (Hillier et al. 2004) and the Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata) with Ensembl assembly number 3.2.4 (Warren et al. 2010), to understand the distribution of sequenced loci across the avian genome.
We compared the four assemblies using the following standard metrics: total number of reads used in the assembly, number of contigs generated, N50 length of contigs, number of contigs, mean contig length, and summed contig length.
The fitness of the individual depends on codon frequencies used, the total number of nucleotides used for the artificial gene synthesis, and the number of steps required for assembly (number of required base protocols).
The first group of index included total number of reads used in the assembly, number of contigs generated, N50 length of contigs, number of contigs, mean contig length, and summed contig length (Table 2).
All assemblies resulting from different k-mers were compared using the following assembly quality parameters: N50 contig size, largest contig size, number of contigs, number of reads used in the assembly, number of reads mapped back to the assembly, assembly completeness as assessed by CEGMA pipeline (Parra et al. 2007), and size of the assembled genome.
We compared the assemblies using the following standard metrics: total number of reads used in the assembly, number of contigs > 100 bases generated, N50 length of contigs (the smallest contig size in which half the assembly is represented), maximum contig length, summed contig length, and approximate time taken to perform analysis (Table 4).
The sequencing statistics for line and sequence sequence strategy are provided, including the combined read length, number of reads sequenced, number of non-duplicate reads mapping to the D. ananassae caf1 assembly, number of non-duplicate reads mapping to the wRi genome, and the ratio of the reads mapping to the wRi and D. ananassae genomes.
