Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
E.coli strain DH5α [genotype:F- supE44_lacU169 f80 lacZ_ M15 hsdR17 recA1 0endA1 gyrA96 thi-1 relA1] (Takara, Japan) was used for all DNA cloning assays in this study.
The water extracts of the compost was used for the germination assays in this study to overcome this effect.
The procedure of the behavioural assays in this study was adopted from that of Kasumyan and Morsi (1996) with modifications.
Finally, one gene belonging to the group of genes related with ribosomal proteins, RPS24, was selected as the housekeeping gene for the validation assays in this study.
The highly consistent results from the multiple qPCR assays and the low variances among the replicates clearly indicate that the qPCR assays in this study were robust, highly reproducible and the evaluation results are reliable.
We used human genomic DNA as the template in all digital PCR assays in this study.
The assays in this study where designed and conducted by JM.
The assays in this study were performed using entire gingival tissue, containing epithelial and connective tissue cells, including blood cells.
Concentrations of enzymes and substrates used in the enzyme assays in this study (Tables S1 and S2, respectively).
Due to the fact that the FIBTEM trace rarely reaches amplitude of 20 mm, the CFT and alpha angle was omitted for the FIBTEM assays in this study.
Both assays in this study have an excellent specificity and the sensitivity was 33% and 78% for the RVP and the RespiFinder-19 assay, respectively.
More suggestions(17)
analysis in this study
testing in this study
methodologies in this study
concentrations in this study
papers in this study
assignments in this study
measurements in this study
replicates in this study
tests in this study
analyses in this study
experiments in this study
analyzes in this study
assays in this workflow
assays in this work
assays in this order
assays in this figure
assays in this row
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com