Suggestions(1)
Exact(7)
JL and PC supported the cell culture and luciferase reporter assays and evaluated the manuscript.
We assessed our methods using samples from seven different target enrichment assays, and evaluated our results using simulated data and real germline data with known CNV genotypes.
Finally, as part of our ongoing lead optimization, we next selected 18 random inhibitors, which displayed a 3-log range in potency in cellular AlphaLISA assays, and evaluated their activity in OV90 cells using the in situ cell extraction assay (Fig. 6).
The RNA quality was analyzed by Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer RNA assays and evaluated by calculating the ratio of the 28S and 18S ribosomal RNA intensity peaks.
We determined imprecisions for each of the Simple Plex assays and evaluated the ability of Simple Plex to detect IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 in serum samples.
We measured multiple inflammatory mediators in plasma using multiplex assays and evaluated the association between mediator concentrations and acid base variables using a variety of statistical modeling approaches, including generalized linear models, multiadaptive regression splines and principal component analysis.
Similar(53)
The present studies were conducted to characterize lipemic interference across three FDA-cleared ceruloplasmin (CERU) assays and to evaluate procedures designed to remove lipemic interference.
Luminescence activity reflected by the number of relative light units (RLU) was normalized by undertaking parallel MTS assays and evaluating cell number in untreated samples.
To support findings from the PLA assays and evaluate the degree of Hsp20-PKD1 complex distribution, we resorted to conventional cell fractionation.
In this study, we developed a new Brucella canis species-specific (BcSS) PCR assay and evaluated its specificity and sensitivity.
To overcome these drawbacks of existing techniques, we developed a pentaplex PCR assay and evaluated its ability to detect and identify three enteropathogenic bacteria species at the genus and species levels.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com