Sentence examples for assayed the number of from inspiring English sources

We assayed the number of synaptic ribbons in the three types of hair cells by labeling with a polyclonal antiserum directed against C-terminal binding protein 2 (CtBP2).

We also assayed the number of neutrophils recruited in response to allergen challenge.

We performed BrdU incorporation studies over 7 days with females irradiated at 9 krad and assayed the number of germaria that had BrdU positive cells in region 1.

We assayed the number of chromosomes (defined here as DAPI-staining or mCherry:histone-positive bodies that would include univalents and bivalents) present at metaphase of meiosis I and II.

Following microbial assays, the work demonstrated that on all the surfaces, following attachment, adhesion and retention assays, the number of Escherichia coli on the laser textured surfaces was reduced.

In order to assay the number of bilayers in our samples, we have used electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS, see Supporting Information 3) to determine the capacitance of SLBs.

For transwell invasion assays, the number of cells invading through basement membrane material toward a serum gradient after 24 h was counted.

In our TUNEL assays, the number of apoptotic cells showed marked increases in the ischemic cortex after 3 d of reperfusion, and EA at acupoints (initiated after 1 d of reperfusion) markedly reduced apoptotic activity in the ischemic cortex.

During the biodegradation assays, the number of viable yeasts was measured by counting of heterotrophic microbes in Petri dishes, expressing the result as colony-forming units (CFU) per ml.

To rule out any possible toxic effect resulting from a combination of the mutagen used and plant extracts in the mutagenicity/antimutagenicity evaluation assays, the number of colony/plate evaluation was performed.

In the in vitro Matrigel invasion assays, the number of cells invaded through the transwell membrane in the pIRES2- EGFP- MSRA transfected group (7.40 ± 1.67) was significantly lower than those in the pIRES2-EGFP control group (17.20 ± 2.59, p= 0.0001).