Sentence examples for assay of hpv from inspiring English sources

Because the duration of the initial hrHPV infection until the development of invasive cancer is long, assay of HPV DNA as a screening tool is appealing [ 6, 7].

However, due to multiple infections, cross-reactivity of nononcogenic HPV types, and variability of cellularity of cervical scrapings, HC2 assay of HR-HPV load has not been validated as a quantitative test.

Expression patterns of hScrib and PP1γ were assessed by immunohistochemistry of HPV-16 positive cervical intraepithelial neoplasm (CIN), classified as CIN1 (n = 4), CIN2 (n = 8), CIN3 (n = 8), cervical carcinoma tissues (n = 11), and HPV-negative cervical tissues (n = 8), as well as by subfractionation assay of the HPV-16 positive cervical cancer cell lines, CaSki and SiHa.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is an important part of cervical carcinoma screening, and the most widely used assay for detection of HPV is Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2).

An optimised PCR protocol was then compared to a line blot assay for detection of HPV in 15 oropharyngeal cancer samples.

We need to be aware that accuracy of prevalence estimates based on panels of genotyping assay results can vary by true underlying infection burden, genotyping assay performance and number of HPV types included in the composite measure.

The sensitivity of the two assays for HPV typing was 94% for LQ and 99% for LA (compared with HCII).

According to our assay, the infectious rate of HPV 16 in these female outpatients is about 8.1% (13/160) by hybridization method and about 6.9% (11/160) by type-specific PCR method.

Hereon, we report a rapid and facile quantum dots (QDs) and superparamagnetic nanoparticle-based hybridization assay for the detection of (HPV) 16 infections which combines the merits of superparamagnetic nanoparticles and QDs and wholly differs from a conventional hybridization assay at that the reaction occurs at homogeneous solution, and total time for detection is no more than 1 h.

Sub-optimal sample handling after collection, under field conditions where samples are exposed to heat and adverse storage conditions and times, might explain loss of HPV assay sensitivity.

Furthermore, the performance of HPV assays is less subject to variation across centers.