The phrase "aspects of objectivity" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing different elements or features related to the concept of objectivity in various contexts, such as philosophy, science, or journalism.
Example: "In our analysis, we will explore the various aspects of objectivity that influence research outcomes."
Alternatives: "elements of objectivity" or "dimensions of objectivity".
Part (B) of the analysis is an attempt to improve futures studies by highlighting certain problematic aspects of objectivity vs. subjectivity, which the Enquete Commission, as a political body, has dealt with differently than futures studies generally has.
After discussing three case studies about objectivity in scientific practice (from economics, social science and medicine) as well as a radical alternative to the traditional conceptions of objectivity, instrumentalism, we draw some conclusions about what aspects of objectivity remain defensible and desirable in the light of the difficulties we have discussed.
We can call it swallowing our pride, subduing our ego, backing down, but in reality, we are activating a level of objectivity that observes all aspects of the situation and is able to respond without embarrassing or embittering.
How, as a historian, do you stand on the matter of objectivity? A. There are contentious aspects to the way I tell the story, but I actually don't believe the term "objective" is without meaning.
There may be pressure to imbue cultural diversity issues with levels of objectivity and certainty representative of other aspects of the medical curriculum (e.g. – biochemistry).
Postmodern philosophers and philosophers of education challenge basic aspects of traditional philosophical theorizing by calling into question the possibility of objectivity, the neutrality of reason, the stability of meaning, and the distinction between truth and power.
In addressing the question of objectivity, Lloyd and Anderson both make use of Hugh Lacey's distinction between two aspects of the value-free ideal: neutrality and impartiality, to clarify how interests and values may be implicated in good science (Lacey 1999, 2 6).
"One of the most powerful aspects of what we do is the ruthless objectivity of our system," Copaken said.
Aspects of systematic-review methodology designed to increase objectivity and transparency may add to the time and investment required to develop literature-based evaluations, and the NTP is mindful of these concerns.
A feeling of objectivity.
Scholars do generally agree that the pursuit of objectivity is desirable, provided this stance does not involve the sacrifice of a sense of the inner aspect of religion.
