The phrase "aspects of morality" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing different elements or dimensions related to moral principles or ethical considerations.
Example: "In our discussion, we will explore various aspects of morality, including justice, fairness, and responsibility."
Alternatives: "elements of ethics" or "dimensions of morality".
Even if a consensus would exist on the mechanisms of morality and how to achieve more moral behavior, several authors question whether it is enough for any moral bioenhancement intervention to have effect on behavior, but not necessarily on other aspects of morality, such as moral reasoning, moral insight, or moral will.
Mendez and colleagues have shown that bvFTD undermines emotional aspects of morality despite sparing cognitive moral reasoning (Mendez et al. 2005; Mendez and Shapira 2009), suggesting that a core unifying deficit in bvFTD may be capacity to feel or care about the social impact of one's own behavior.
Moreover, cognitive approaches of moral psychology, e.g. the moral-conventional distinction model of Turiel [ 20], have emphasized universal aspects of morality in the sense that the moral wrongness of an action does not depend on specific circumstances.
Second, a metaethical moral relativist position might be defended by emphasizing aspects of morality other than disagreement.
While certain aspects of morality ought to apply without regard for the identity of other persons and any relationships I may have with them, many other aspects of morality are precisely relational.
This 'moral stand-still' has led to technological experiments aimed at resolving this scarcity and to the reinterpretation of aspects of morality that seem more flexible than the principles of bodily integrity and self-determination.
Arguments from moral normativity observe some aspect of morality and argue that God is the best or only explanation for this, concluding that God must exist.
It's true that "The Evolution of God" focuses more on changes in moral doctrine than on moral acts per se, but by mostly neglecting this win-lose aspect of morality, Wright has evaded something important.[3].
The aspect of morality that we truly marvel at — its generality and universality — is the product of culture, not of biology.
An aspect of morality that Saunders is particularly interested in is the pressure that one person doing the right thing exerts on the vast majority of regular people who prefer to bump along with the blinkers on, making immoral or at least amoral choices and not appreciating being made to think about it.
Clarke, Hume's central rationalist opponent, appeals to reason to explain almost every aspect of morality.
